Alito's concerns about "loopholes" in the Supreme Court's universal injunctions ruling emerge as judges issue sweeping ...

Opinion It’s time for Justice Alito to face some consequences Democrats should make the Supreme Court more of a campaign issue 0 seconds of 4 minutes, 36 secondsVolume 0% ...

Justice Alito is rejecting calls for his recusal from cases related to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack and the 2020 election after recent controversies.

The Republican Party’s man inside the Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito brings no vision and no unique insights to his job — other than unrelenting loyalty to the GOP.

Justice Samuel Alito has come under pressure from congressional Democrats to recuse himself from cases involving the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack and former President Donald Trump.

Justice Samuel Alito on Wednesday issued a public rebuttal to a new report detailing a luxury vacation he took with a wealthy hedge fund manager who later had business before the Supreme Court ...

In the years after the undisclosed trip to Alaska, Republican megadonor Paul Singer’s hedge fund has repeatedly had business before the Supreme Court. Alito has never recused himself.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. slammed his Supreme Court colleagues for “hastily” blocking President Donald Trump’s latest round of deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. Alito, 75, wrote a ...

Justice Samuel Alito wrote Wednesday that he is “stunned” by the majority’s failure to call out a lower court’s “judicial hubris” in the case considering the Trump administration’s ...

Even in the desensitized landscape of death-penalty cases, the justice’s opinion in Gutierrez manages to stun.

In an excellent opinion by Justice Barrett, the Supreme Court ruled today in Trump v. CASA, Inc. that a federal court’s authority to enjoin government officials from enforcing a challenged law or ...

JUSTICE ALITO: I mean, the district court was worried that this would have an effect on something like Netflix, right? I mean, is Netflix a party here? FREE SPEECH COALITION: No, they're not.