The St. Ives apricot scrub lawsuit alleged that one of its most popular products, the St. Ives Apricot Fresh Skin Scrub, may actually damage skin.

A lawsuit against St. Ives' parent company Unilever claims the popular exfoliating scrub creates tiny tears in the skin and is not noncomedogenic, meaning it actually can clog pores.

But St Ives apricot scrub is now the subject of a class action law suit in the US worth $5m (approx £4m). Two women in the US are suing Unilever, the company that makes the cream, claiming it is ...

I don’t want no scrubs.I bought into the St. Ives lie for years. In the already insecure times of high school and college, my skin was host to constant colonies of acne, my nose peppered with ...

A lawsuit against St. Ives' parent company Unilever claims the popular exfoliating scrub creates tiny tears in the skin and is not noncomedogenic, meaning it actually can clog pores.

A lawsuit against St. Ives' parent company Unilever claims the popular exfoliating scrub creates tiny tears in the skin and is not noncomedogenic, meaning it actually can clog pores.

A lawsuit against St. Ives' parent company Unilever claims the popular exfoliating scrub creates tiny tears in the skin and is not noncomedogenic, meaning it actually can clog pores.